It is almost 3 yrs since I left my p after one year of marriage and we are still not divorced! Our little girl is almost 4. Our trial is in a few weeks and I must recommend to any of you trying to protect your children to read the book, The Batterer as a Parent by Lundy Bancroft and Jay Silverman.Although this book is not directly about psychopaths, many p's are abusive (as we all know). I found this book an invaluable validation of my experiences and fears.
I plan on using my own divorce trial as a forum to possibly gain case law in my state on issues that need recognition in the legal community: 1. anger management courses are not domestic violence courses in that they do not need the batterer to recognize that his/her actions are abusive (my p was allowed to find his own anger management course after being asked to leave a court ordered batterer program because he refused to take responsibility for his actions/If the judge had no discretion he would have been ordered into another batterer program and probably would have failed to pass it. His visitation was reinstated after suspension for "successfully completing the batterer program" Malarkey. 2. Abuse against women (spouse)is correlated with abuse against children, or the potential for abuse. (my daughter's law guardian has neatly separated the two and claims that just because the p abuses me doesn't mean he is abusing his daughter. This despite the fact that the guy shook the kid as a baby, didn't pay any money to support her unless garnished/threatened with jail, and made us homeless. 3. I want to raise the bar in the courts that unless the kid is sexually or physically abused the father still gets visitation unsupervised. This negates the protection of the kid against the constant lies,mind games and manipulation these p's do. (This last point I know I will lose. Look at all the instances the father has gotten custody after he kills the mother/or after the mother alleges sexual or other abuse/or after the mother tries to tell the kid "Daddy lies, watch out (automatically parental alienation instead of protecting the child).
I have so many hoops I have to go through to do the above: I have to prove my p to be a liar, batterer, and a p! Anyone out there with any expertise in this? I feel I am fighting a battle for myself and my battered brethren.
survivor