Hi Dude
It’s so difficult to interpret the reactions you mention. I do agree with Di that there is a performance laid on to attract a victim. I suppose the timescale and context of the things you mention will be relevant.
When did she cry at films, who was observing and did she think it was the expected response or a natural reaction? My partner’s kid used to watch us watching films or TV and copy our responses. If we laughed-he laughed but he got ahead of himself and tried to pre-empt us and failed miserably. He laughed at the wrong times and would look at us to see what we were doing. If we watched sad, emotional programmes he would show no response whatsoever and get very bored.
Being friendly to people is difficult to quantify, it could be to show observers that she is capable of making contact but it could have been a genuine flash of bonding…..tricky one. Same for the mobile phone being placed where it’s needed….unless she was the person who would phone you first.
Buying nice things …yet again it could be for two reasons. Because she wanted to give you nice things OR to let other people see what she had given you.
As for anyone who teases or mistreats animals scores minus 1000 with me.
Psychopaths don’t think in the conventional way…they plot.
When your ex said ‘out of sight out of mind’ reminded me of ‘Damien’. Every day when he came home he said “what have you both done all day?” Out of sight, out of mind? We were advised to respond with “waiting for you” and it worked. He never asked again.
I asked Damien during one of those moments when it’s right, who he loved, He was totally thrown. He did the sideways glance, screwed up face but no response. He couldn’t answer as he was perplexed, he didn’t know what he was supposed to say.
When he did respond he chose his grandmother!!! Not his father (who had custody) giving him all he could and more.
There is so much more but I do think when these observations are made is important.
I'm just going to check out the link you posted.
Regards
Jan